Code Issues Solver | R
Streamlined Conditional Expression for Workflow Automation
This analysis details a refactored code snippet for a conditional expression in Microsoft Power Automate, improving readability and maintainability by simplifying complex conditions for determining outcomes based on `Trait_Code` and
Prompt
Answer
Code Analysis
The code provided is a conditional expression likely used in a platform such as Microsoft Power Automate or another workflow automation tool. This snippet is used to determine specific outcomes based on conditions related to Trait_Code
and MAIC_Plan
.
Problem Outline
From the given code:
- The goal is to execute specific actions based on multiple conditions.
- These conditions involve checking if
Trait_Code
matches any ofNL, NZ, MG, MB
- Additionally, it checks if
MAIC_Plan
is48-48-48
. - If these conditions are met, it should output 'B3'.
- If the condition for
MAIC_Plan
being either48-48-48
or90-90-90
is met, it should output 'F2'.
Issues Identified
- The inner nested structure is overly complex.
- Multiple
or
andequals
functions can be simplified. - The final
IF
statement appears to have syntax issues, particularly in parameter separation and format.
Solution Development
To achieve a more streamlined and readable code, the conditions can be restructured. By restructuring, we can also ensure logical correctness and improved maintainability.
Revised Solution
Below is the refactored and corrected version of the code, assuming the syntax is for Microsoft Power Automate or a similar system.
if(
and(
or(
in(triggerBody()?['Trait_Code'], array('NL', 'NZ', 'MG', 'MB')),
equals(triggerBody()?['MAIC_Plan'], '48-48-48')
)
),
'B3',
if(
or(
equals(triggerBody()?['MAIC_Plan'], '48-48-48'),
equals(triggerBody()?['MAIC_Plan'], '90-90-90')
),
'F2',
'Default' // Implement a default case or proper fallback
)
)
Breakdown
Condition Combination:
- Use
in
for array membership check to simplify multipleor
operations. - Check if
Trait_Code
is one ofNL, NZ, MG, MB
. - Check
MAIC_Plan
separately within anor
function.
- Use
Output Determination:
- Output 'B3' if the main conditions are met.
- Nested
if
to determine output 'F2' if theMAIC_Plan
meets the second set of conditions. - Add a default fallback value for the final
if
to handle cases where no conditions are met.
Practical Example
Given the environment is a workflow-trigger which processes certain events:
// Example code for a function in Power Automate
function evaluateConditions(triggerBody) {
const traitCode = triggerBody()['Trait_Code'];
const maicPlan = triggerBody()['MAIC_Plan'];
if (
(['NL', 'NZ', 'MG', 'MB'].includes(traitCode) && maicPlan === '48-48-48')
) {
return 'B3';
} else if (['48-48-48', '90-90-90'].includes(maicPlan)) {
return 'F2';
} else {
return 'Default'; // Specify a suitable default outcome
}
}
// Example usage
const triggerBody = () => ({ 'Trait_Code': 'NL', 'MAIC_Plan': '48-48-48' });
console.log(evaluateConditions(triggerBody)); // Outputs: 'B3'
This refactored function ensures that the code is clean, easy to understand, and maintains the logical structure required to solve the outlined problem efficiently.
Description
This analysis details a refactored code snippet for a conditional expression in Microsoft Power Automate, improving readability and maintainability by simplifying complex conditions for determining outcomes based on Trait_Code
and MAIC_Plan
.