Code Issues Solver | R

Streamlined Conditional Expression for Workflow Automation

This analysis details a refactored code snippet for a conditional expression in Microsoft Power Automate, improving readability and maintainability by simplifying complex conditions for determining outcomes based on `Trait_Code` and


Empty image or helper icon

Prompt

if(
  and(
    or(
      or(
        equals(triggerBody()?['Trait_Code'],'NL'),
        equals(triggerBody()?['Trait_Code'],'NZ')
      ),
      or(
        equals(triggerBody()?['Trait_Code'],'MG'),
        equals(triggerBody()?['Trait_Code'],'MB')
      )
    ),
    equals(triggerBody()?['MAIC_Plan'], '48-48-48')
  )
,
'B3',
IF(or(equals(equals(triggerBody()?['MAIC_Plan'], '48-48-48'),
equals(equals(triggerBody()?['MAIC_Plan'], '90-90-90')),'F2')))
))

Answer

Code Analysis

The code provided is a conditional expression likely used in a platform such as Microsoft Power Automate or another workflow automation tool. This snippet is used to determine specific outcomes based on conditions related to Trait_Code and MAIC_Plan.

Problem Outline

From the given code:

  1. The goal is to execute specific actions based on multiple conditions.
  2. These conditions involve checking if Trait_Code matches any of NL, NZ, MG, MB
  3. Additionally, it checks if MAIC_Plan is 48-48-48.
  4. If these conditions are met, it should output 'B3'.
  5. If the condition for MAIC_Plan being either 48-48-48 or 90-90-90 is met, it should output 'F2'.

Issues Identified

  • The inner nested structure is overly complex.
  • Multiple or and equals functions can be simplified.
  • The final IF statement appears to have syntax issues, particularly in parameter separation and format.

Solution Development

To achieve a more streamlined and readable code, the conditions can be restructured. By restructuring, we can also ensure logical correctness and improved maintainability.

Revised Solution

Below is the refactored and corrected version of the code, assuming the syntax is for Microsoft Power Automate or a similar system.

if(
  and(
    or(
      in(triggerBody()?['Trait_Code'], array('NL', 'NZ', 'MG', 'MB')),
      equals(triggerBody()?['MAIC_Plan'], '48-48-48')
    )
  ),
  'B3',
  if(
    or(
      equals(triggerBody()?['MAIC_Plan'], '48-48-48'),
      equals(triggerBody()?['MAIC_Plan'], '90-90-90')
    ),
    'F2',
    'Default'  // Implement a default case or proper fallback
  )
)

Breakdown

  1. Condition Combination:

    • Use in for array membership check to simplify multiple or operations.
    • Check if Trait_Code is one of NL, NZ, MG, MB.
    • Check MAIC_Plan separately within an or function.
  2. Output Determination:

    • Output 'B3' if the main conditions are met.
    • Nested if to determine output 'F2' if the MAIC_Plan meets the second set of conditions.
    • Add a default fallback value for the final if to handle cases where no conditions are met.

Practical Example

Given the environment is a workflow-trigger which processes certain events:

// Example code for a function in Power Automate
function evaluateConditions(triggerBody) {
    const traitCode = triggerBody()['Trait_Code'];
    const maicPlan = triggerBody()['MAIC_Plan'];

    if (
        (['NL', 'NZ', 'MG', 'MB'].includes(traitCode) && maicPlan === '48-48-48')
    ) {
        return 'B3';
    } else if (['48-48-48', '90-90-90'].includes(maicPlan)) {
        return 'F2';
    } else {
        return 'Default'; // Specify a suitable default outcome
    }
}

// Example usage
const triggerBody = () => ({ 'Trait_Code': 'NL', 'MAIC_Plan': '48-48-48' });
console.log(evaluateConditions(triggerBody)); // Outputs: 'B3'

This refactored function ensures that the code is clean, easy to understand, and maintains the logical structure required to solve the outlined problem efficiently.

Create your Thread using our flexible tools, share it with friends and colleagues.

Your current query will become the main foundation for the thread, which you can expand with other tools presented on our platform. We will help you choose tools so that your thread is structured and logically built.

Description

This analysis details a refactored code snippet for a conditional expression in Microsoft Power Automate, improving readability and maintainability by simplifying complex conditions for determining outcomes based on Trait_Code and MAIC_Plan.